Newsday: Vote set on $19.6 million North Shore school bond

Vote set on $19.6 million North Shore school bond

Published: November 27, 2013 5:26 PM
By JENNIFER BARRIOS

A proposed $19.6 million bond measure to fix up the infrastructure at the North Shore school district is drawing the ire of one property-owners group, which claims the measure is too costly.

Voters in the Sea Cliff-based district are slated to head to the polls Tuesday to decide the fate of the referendum, which would cover replacement windows, floors and roofs, security upgrades, repairs to the electrical systems and new masonry walls, among other items.

The district estimated that the bond would have no effect on taxes because it would replace older bonds that will be paid off.

“As we’re retiring debt, we’re adding debt,” said Herman Berliner, president of the school board.

But Anthony Losquadro, director of the Sea Cliff-North Shore Property Owners Committee, said the measure included too many items, including some he said were cosmetic and unnecessary.

In addition, the decommissioning of the Long Island Power Authority’s Glenwood Landing power plant, and the subsequent loss of tax revenue from it, means voters shouldn’t take on more debt now, Losquadro said.

“Send the proposal back to the board and let them refine it and pare it down and bring it back to us for another vote,” he said.

But Berliner said the list already represents the most essential repairs, and it would be more costly in the long run to put them off.

“There are no frills, no fluff, nothing like that in the bond issue,” Berliner said. “We take very seriously our fiduciary responsibilities and looked at what made the most sense in a very difficult economic time.”

Sea Cliff – North Shore POC files legal action against North Shore School District

The Sea Cliff – North Shore Property Owners Committee has filed a legal petition with the New York State Commissioner of Education against the North Shore Central School District citing violations of State Law with regards to the upcoming bond referendum.

 BACKGROUND

The North Shore School District is seeking to pass a $19.6 million dollar bond issue for the purposes of infrastructure improvements to the school facilities. After extensive evaluation of the proposed improvements which included review of hundreds of pages of documents, investigations, questioning of school officials and engineers, and site visits, the SCPOC contends that many of the improvements and renovations are unnecessary and a waste of taxpayer funds. SCPOC further contends that the district is using illegal tactics to railroad the bonds passage at the ballot box. Furthermore, the district hired construction consultants that are paid to advise the district on the nature and method of renovation. The consultants are paid in proportion to the amount of expenditure of the projects (known as “SOFT COSTS”,) hence they may have a vested interest in inflating the renovation costs. The school tax issues are being made more compelling due to the LIPA-Glenwood Power Plant shutdown that will increase school taxes by 19%.

SCPOC alleges violations of N.Y.S. Law in promotion of the bond referendum to voters

The SCPOC alleges that the school district printed and circulated “marketing advertisements” or “flyers” that are designed to sway the electorate to cast their ballots in support of a particular position advocated by the Board of Education. The advertisements also contained misleading statements, and wording designed to deceive voters with a false sense of urgency. The advertisements advocate a partisan position of the School District in advocating a YES vote for the Bond Referendum on December 3, 2013;, and secondly, the printing and distribution of these advertising flyers violates the constitutional prohibition against using public (tax payer) funds to advance and promote a partisan position. The prohibition against school districts engaging in this behavior is enshrined in both the N.Y.S. Constitution and legal decisions rendered by the N.Y.S. Court of Appeals.
The SCPOC seeks to bar the school district from further distribution of the illegal flyers to the electorate, and cancellation of the scheduled Bond Vote on December 3, or until the matter can be adjudicated.

SCPOC attempted to amicably resolve the issue before commencing litigation

SCPOC initially expressed our concerns with the school district’s practices in a two page letter sent to Superintendent Melnick and the Board of Education Trustees earlier last month. Our intention was to address our issues raised with the district beforehand to ensure a fair and ethical referendum vote. It was the sincere desire of SCPOC to avoid the cost and distraction of litigation for both the district and ourselves by amicably resolving the matter before resorting to legal action.  Melnick consulted with the school’s attorney and promptly responded to our letter, but in a tersely worded statement they did not agree with our position or share our concerns. Hence, SCPOC was left with no choice but to challenge the school district before the New York State Commissioner of Education to protect the interest of district taxpayers.

Why SCPOC opposes the Bond

As previously mentioned, after extensive review, the SCPOC has concluded that the $19.6 Million dollar bond being requested by the NSSD is unneeded and a waste of taxpayer funds. Many of the proposed renovations can be done in a less costly manner, or deferred for many years. Just to provide one example, the roof on the Sea Cliff School is only 13 years old and the district is seeking an astounding $741,000 to replace it. The roof has a lifespan of at least 10 more years! The engineering consultant’s own report give the roof a “satisfactory” rating. It is clear to us that these renovations will only benefit the contractors and consultants that are looking for lucrative school contracts, not the students.

Next Steps

SCPOC will keep you informed of the legal status on this case. The outcome of any litigation is not guaranteed but we will try our best to faithfully advocate for you, the taxpayer. This is the first step SCPOC is taking to stop the passage and implementation of this bond. Our goal is to send this bond issue back to the Board of Education for further review and paring down of costs. We will also be sending out further emails to give you more detailed information about the renovations, the bond, and further developments as they arise.

Important

If you think that SCPOC is doing a good job by fighting for you, the taxpayer, please consider a donation to SCPOC. While our attorney is giving us a very favorable rate to represent us and he is sympathetic to our plight, these legal challenges are still very costly. Consider your donation in the context of the thousands of dollars you pay for school taxes- TAXES YOU MUST PAY EVEN IF YOU HAVE NO KIDS IN SCHOOL. TAXES YOU MUST PAY EVEN THOUGH YOUR INCOME DID NOT INCREASE.

How much are your school taxes this year? $6000? $8000? 10,000? What will your taxes increase to next year, and the year after that? $7700? $10,200? $12,800?  SCPOC is the only group actively fighting those increases. Give us a few dollars to avoid paying the tax collector thousands. Please consider a $100 donation.

We accept donations by Paypal or Check. Please make checks payable to:
Sea Cliff – North Shore POC
PO Box 75
Sea Cliff, NY, 11579

Newsday – LIPA effort to settle tax grievance cases hits snags

LIPA effort to settle tax grievance cases hits snags

Originally published: November 2, 2013 9:05 PM
Updated: November 2, 2013 10:47 PM
By MARK HARRINGTON  mark.harrington@newsday.com

This file photo shows the National Grid power

Photo credit: Newsday / John Paraskevas | This file photo shows the National Grid power plant in Northport. (Oct. 28, 2010)

The Long Island Power Authority’s effort to settle tens of millions of dollars in power-plant tax grievance cases that it has filed against school districts and municipalities has hit a series of snags and could wind up back in court.

The authority, as part of overhaul legislation backed by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo this summer, had given six Long Island municipalities and school districts until Oct. 20 to settle the cases, but none thus far have accepted, LIPA spokesman Mark Gross said.

“LIPA has not extended the deadline for the offer and is moving forward with the litigation,” he said in a statement. And while noting that none of the parties has settled to date, he added, “LIPA remains open to any settlement discussions related to the tax litigation.”

 

LIPA has proposed trimming millions of dollars in annual tax payments to each of the districts and municipalities over 10 years starting in 2014, while forgiving all of LIPA’s claims of past overpaid taxes — which amount to tens of millions of dollars more. If settlements aren’t reached and LIPA wins the challenges in court, it would result in a significantly higher bill for taxpayers, including retroactive payments for the past taxes paid based on the overassessment.

The North Shore Central School District two weeks ago filed a lawsuit in State Supreme Court, alleging that LIPA and plant owner National Grid breached a 1997 power-supply contract by filing the tax claim in the first place. It joins a similar suit filed by the Town of Huntington and the Northport-East Northport School District that claim LIPA’s original power supply contract and a letter from former LIPA chief Richard Kessel prevented the utility from challenging the assessments.

LIPA “didn’t have the right to bring them [tax grievances cases] in the first place,” said John Gross, an attorney for the districts.

LIPA says the plants — in Northport, Port Jefferson, Island Park and Glenwood Landing — are overassessed by upward of 90 percent, and have been depreciating in value for decades as they near the end of their useful lives.

Under LIPA’s proposed settlements, by 2024-25, the Oceanside Union Free School District would see a reduction of tax payments from LIPA to roughly $9 million a year from the current $13.6 million. The Island Park Union Free School District’s LIPA payment would be cut to $10 million from a current $22.2 million. And the North Shore Central School District would see taxes cut to $8 million from a current $22.6 million. The latter district is host to the Glenwood Landing power station, large parts of which are scheduled for decommissioning and demolition.

Lawyers for the districts say they would prefer to see any reduction take place over a longer period — 20 to 30 years rather than the 10 LIPA proposed.

Stephen Waldenburg, president of the Northport Board of Education, called it “regrettable” that LIPA wouldn’t extend the settlement offer given the “significant legal concerns” in the offer. “At present, we believe we have a valid pending legal claim against LIPA, but stand ready to continue our related discussions,” he said.

Huntington Town, whose Northport-East Northport Union Free School District faces a LIPA annual tax payment cut more than in half under the settlement, from $74.4 million to $30.8 million, has asked LIPA for an extension of the settlement offer to Jan. 15.

Tom Knierim, vice president of the North Shore Board of Education, said the district had “no choice” but to file suit against LIPA because “the potential impact to the district is great and it is important that we have a seat at the negotiating table.”

Not all parties presented with a settlement offer are balking. The Village of Port Jefferson, its school districts and Brookhaven Town have met with LIPA on at least three occasions on settlement talks and are close to reaching an agreement, said Margot Garant, mayor of Port Jefferson Village.

Under LIPA’s proposed settlement, the Three Village Central School District and the Port Jefferson School District would see taxes drop from $27.5 million a year in 2013 to $9 million by 2024-25. The village would see tax payments from LIPA cut to $864,806 from a current $2.5 million a year.

“We continue to negotiate in good faith,” said Garant. “We’re all on the same page.” She said she expects a settlement by early next year.

Jack Krieger, a spokesman for Brookhaven Town, said, “We are still negotiating the terms.”

“The Huntington Town Board is greatly concerned with the impact that a tax reassessment of the Northport power plant will have on residents and throughout the town,” Town Attorney Cindy Elan-Mangano wrote LIPA on Oct. 16. The town requested information on just how LIPA reached figures for its lower tax payment.

LIPA in a letter dated Oct. 21 to the Huntington town attorney said the settlement offer “has been pending for months,” giving the parties ample time to decide “whether they would like to avoid the continued risk of litigation.”

Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli, who is representing Nassau districts in cases involving the Island Park and Glenwood Landing plants, said, “We are always working to settle cases, however, we are also prepared to move forward and fight this case in court to protect our taxpayers.”

Officials for the Oceanside School District and the Island Park Public Schools didn’t return calls seeking comment.